电子政府成功发展的关键因素分析

在电子政府建设方面,加拿大、美国、英国等国家都已经取得了一定的成绩,但各国在电子政府成功发展的道路上都存在着一些影响电子政府进程的关键因素。本文提出了电子政府成功发展的关键因素,并对此进行分析、论述,希望能够促进电子政府的建设。     

A Systemic Evaluation of the State of Affairs Following the Negative Outcome of the Referendum in Cyprus Using the Structured Dialogic Design Process

This paper reports the results of the first of a series of co-laboratories organized by Cypriot peace pioneers 30 months after the negative outcome of the referendum concerning UN General Secretary’s plan for reunification of the island. The purpose of this co-laboratory was to support a diverse group of disengaged and disappointed peace pioneers and activists representing Turkish and Greek communities of Cyprus develop a shared understanding of factors contributing to the perceived widening of the gap between the two divided communities in Cyprus. The co-laboratory was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication environment. The root causes contributing to the widening of the gap are discussed and are also compared with those identified during a similar co-laboratory employing the Interactive Management methodology 12 years earlier.

论萨托利的消极技术民主观

萨托利的消极技术民主观源于对唯科学主义的警惕和戒惧。唯科学主义分为客观主义、集体主义和历史主义,具有导致极权主义的可能性和现实性,易损害民主信仰、民主程序和民主过程。捍卫民主必须回归其本源,重视科学反对唯科学主义、重视理性反对唯理性主义,设置技术与民主的边界,以政治平等原则抵制专家治国的越界。     

我国基层民主建设的社会资本视角

基层民主问题是我国政治建设中的一个基本问题,充分发育的社会资本是我国基层民主得以生成和发展的重要机制.社会资本所包含的信任、互惠规范、公民参与网络等要素,对基层民主的建设具有重要的意义:公民参与网络作为社会资本的重要构成部分,能有效地促进公民有序地参与政治生活的习惯;社会资本对有际合作的促进作用,主要是通过信任与互惠而实现;社会资本中的信任有助于培养公民对现行政治体系的认同感.     

关于罪刑法定原则的思考

罪刑法定原则符合＂权力法无明文规定即禁止＂的精神,罪刑法定有利于保障权利,体现民主;罪刑法定的意义还有其它方面。我国罪刑法定原则还有不完善的地方,需要改进,罪刑法定原则不排斥对法律的新的解释。     

马克思民主思想探析

胡锦涛同志在党的第十七次代表大会报告中提出：“人民民主是社会主义的生命。”可见,民主是一个事关中国特色社会主义伟大事业兴衰成败的根本性问题。马克思民主思想的核心观点认为民主制的实质是一种国家制度,是作为国家制度特殊形式的社会化了的人,其价值旨趣是“自我规定”的人的“自由解放”,而其精神实质是理想性与现实性的统一。     

协商民主理论与中国政党制度建设

协商民主是20世纪后期以来西方社会兴起的一种新型民主理论,它深化了我们对民主政治的认识。政党作为现代民主政治的重要基础,是立法和决策形成的重要参与者,协商民主理论必然涉及政党和政党制度。当代中国政党制度虽然不能按照西方协商民主的路径行进,但能够从协商民主理论中获得知识资源而不断得到补充和完善。     

新公共管理语境下大学自治权限分配的公法争议及其解决

作为一种“历史的妥协”,大学自治的权限分配集中表现为国家管制与学术自治的双重集权结构。在大学自治的外部关系与内部关系方面,分别表现为以功能为导向的国家间隔原则和利益相关者参与原则。在新公共管理语境下,传统的自治观点开始被行政法学视野下的治理理论所取代。据此,大学自治的权限分配开始呈现新的变化,并在学说与实务上引发诸多公法争议。就大学自治的外部关系而言,传统的国家管制模式开始被监管型治理模式所取代,国家规制系统呈现“隐性强化”的特征;就大学自治的内部关系而言,传统的学术自治权限被削弱,而管理自治、利益相关者引导机制以及竞争机制得到持续强化。因此,应重申大学自治权限分配的民主正当路径与合法性逻辑,以实现国家监督、大学自治与师生权益保障之间的动态平衡。     

Participatory Action Research and the Development of Critical Creativity: A “Natural” Combination?

This paper focuses on the research strategy that I employed during doctoral studies. An overarching framework of Action Research (AR) was used in the development of a complementary approach to creative studies. At the time of the studies AR seemed to be a natural choice and I did not overly concern myself with exploring as to why that was the case. However, I recognize the value of contemplating the appropriateness of research strategy and, in this paper, now reflect on some of the parallel strands implicit in AR and in critical creativity that I now realize served to enrich the overall research process.     

The abundant world: Paul Feyerabend's metaphysics of science

The goal of this paper is to provide an interpretation of Feyerabend's metaphysics of science as found in late works like Conquest of Abundance and Tyranny of Science. Feyerabend's late metaphysics consists of an attempt to criticize and provide a systematic alternative to traditional scientific realism, a package of views he sometimes referred to as “scientific materialism.” Scientific materialism is objectionable not only on metaphysical grounds, nor because it provides a poor ground for understanding science, but because it implies problematic claims about the epistemic and cultural authority of science, claims incompatible with situating science properly in democratic societies. I show how Feyerabend's metaphysical view, which I call “the abundant world” or “abundant realism,” constitute a sophisticated and challenging form of ontological pluralism that makes interesting connections with contemporary philosophy of science and issues of the political and policy role of science in a democratic society.